Skip to main content

Why Does a High Ratio Mortgage Get a Better Rate?

This is interesting & we are starting to see more and more of this.....  Click the link or read below.

The Mortgage Group Canada Inc. - British Columbia - News Articles


Wednesday, May 23, 2012

The news about  getting better mortgage rates with a lower down payment has been in the news recently -- if you have a down payment of only 5% and your credit is good, then you could get a rate up to 20 basis points better than if you had a higher down payment. For example, instead of 3.59% on a 5-yr fixed rate you could pay 3.39%.

It may seem counter intuitive and just plain unfair if you're sitting with the higher down payment, but there is method to this interest rate madness. It comes down to two things: insured risk and capital.

Let's face it, bank lenders like sure things and try to reduce their risk as much as possible. When a mortgage is insured, which is the case in high-ratio or low down payment mortgages; it requires the bank to hold less capital against it. Since there is a cost to capital -- both a direct cost as well as an indirect cost, lenders want to apply capital to the areas that will yield the highest return. So, less capital equals less cost, which translates into better rates for insured mortgages. The high-ratio risk is transferred through default insurance from the lender to the insurer. This, despite the fact there may be less risk from clients with more equity.

"It's a conundrum of default insurance," explains Grant MacKenzie, CEO of Canadiana Financial Corp. "Sometimes the toughest credit profile gets the best rates."

Until recently, some low ratio mortgages were bulk insured by Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation (CMHC) but when its insurance cap of $600 billion dollars hit $541 billion dollars, it became more difficult to continue to offer portfolio insurance.

"All Mortgages that are not on a lenders balance sheet - are usually securitized. In Canada, one way we do that is through the Canada Mortgage Bond (CMB)," MacKenzie said. "Lenders have been paying the insurance premium on low-ratio mortgages as it was necessary to securitize them and, lenders can decide whether to add a premium to the rate to cover the increased costs."

"Also, lenders need a balanced portfolio of purchases, refis, Alt-As and rental mortgages," MacKenzie added. "So a premium applied to rates on certain products can effectively speed up or slow down the volume of that mortgage product."

For now, big lenders will likely cover the increased costs with no direct effect on the consumer said John Bordignon, Executive Vice-President of Strategic Development for Paradigm Quest. "Most big banks have stayed away from adding a premium but it will be a big deal over time," he said. "Lenders will eventually want a higher spread and that will be passed on to the consumer."

Bordignon also said that some deals may be harder to fund because of the increase in costs. "All insurers have dollar limits, so it's up to them to decide which products to insure. Since limits have been reduced, money becomes scarcer, which drums up the costs."

However, competition between banks and lenders has kept the interest rates consistent between high and low ratio mortgages, but some monoline lenders have added a rate premium to its conventional business. The industry has already seen premiums added to stated income products. A few bank lenders added the premium then removed them, opting to cover the spread themselves and for very good reasons. Those with large equity positions are potential customers for other business such as lines-of credit, TFSA's, and RRSPs.

"As time progresses, lenders will want to cover those increased costs and we'll likely see consistency in all rates across all lenders," Bordignon said. "The entire market will move that way and costs will be passed onto the consumer, but camouflaged in slightly higher rates."




Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2025 & the Alberta Mortgage Market: What Buyers and Homeowners Need to Know

  The federal government has released its 2025 budget, and while the focus is largely on long-term housing supply, there are several key items that matter for buyers, homeowners, and investors in the Edmonton-area markets — including Spruce Grove, Stony Plain, St. Albert, Leduc, Beaumont, and Sherwood Park . Below is a clear, Alberta-specific breakdown of what changed, what didn’t, and how this affects mortgage decisions over the coming year. 1. The Rate Environment: What It Means in Alberta The Bank of Canada recently reduced its policy rate to 2.25% , bringing mortgage prime down to 4.45% . This matters for our markets because: Variable-rate mortgages are becoming competitive again. Payment shock for renewals may ease slightly. But—and this is key— we do not expect dramatic further rate drops due to ongoing inflation pressures. Bottom line: Alberta borrowers now have more flexibility. Variable may start to make sense again, but choosing between fixed and variable...

New and Improved Website Coming Soon... and some updates! :)

I am so happy to announce that I will be having a new website I am designing! What a learning curve I can tell you - I had someone plug in the theme to use and help with some charts and pictures but I am happy to say I have been the one to put it mostly together! I think however I will stick to Mortgage Building vs Web Building! lol, I am way better at the former than the latter that is true. Speaking of mortgages, as you already know the Bank of Canada has already left the overnight rate as is... so what does that mean for you? The lenders are still offering stable rates with nothing really going up to high or down to low... rates have been pretty consistant. The thing that has not remained steady are mortgage products. Most lenders have now all followed suit in regards to using a 3% payment caculation on all unsecured lines of credit and credit cards vs using the provable payment. This makes things I find tight for First Time Buyers when looking at what they qualify for. For exampl...

Banker vs Broker ...

So I came across an article in the Globe and Mail the other day titled, " Mortgage seekers wonder: Broker or Bank? " And I gotta say, as a mortgage broker whom has come from the banking industry it has left me with a few unanswered questions. But lets see if we can break this article down a bit shall we? " Among the many tough decisions first-time home buyers face is whether to use a mortgage broker or rely on a bank to secure a mortgage. " Is how the article starts, so lets start playing with this puzzle shall we. This statement, '... or rely on a bank to secure a mortgage... ", did the author of this piece not understand that mortgage brokers can use banks to secure mortgages for their clients? Several in fact. Myself here in Alberta, I can use TD Canada Trust, Scotiabank, Canadian Western Bank to name a few.    Another puzzle piece is in paragraph 3, "... The latest, passed last fall, requires those who are applying for an insured mortgage...